Unresolved problems Essay Example For Students

Unresolved problems Essay In what way does the inspector make you aware of his attitude towards other characters in the play? And how does Priestly use him as a dramatic device? Priestley was born in Bradford, 13th September, 1894. He became a successful playwright through much experience he gained before World War One. A major influence which encouraged Priestley with his plays began when he found himself surrounded by people who read a great deal, however there were no professional writers among these people. Not only that but Priestley found himself growing up most importantly into his fathers circle of socialist friends in which he found himself in positive debates about society Being a socialist, Priestley added this to the many themes of An Inspector Calls; to show the audience his values as a socialist, that life is to do with caring for each other and there should be equality no matter what you status is in society; Priestley exploits these problems of community throughout his play. We will write a custom essay on Unresolved problems specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now Socialism is not apparent in Edwardian society where there is an evident class divide which results in poor living for those lower classes such as Eva Smith due to selfish, ignorant, bigheaded, snobbish characters like the Birling family who are capitalists only care about money and profit these are the total opposites to the socialist morals that Priestley believes everyone should have as Birling says, a man has to make his own way has to look after himself this is the total opposite to the caring and looking after each other morals of Priestley. The characters are living stereotypes that all fit into the characteristics of the seven deadly sins and are not aware of the consequences of their inexcusable behaviour. Like Shakespeare, Priestley is a very influential educator through his plays. He draws the reader in and makes them experience certain emotions such as anger, irritation and mystery to read on as the Inspector says, She wanted to end her life. She felt she couldnt go on any longer, the audience feels a sense of the suffering that Eva endured as if we are a part of the play. In this aspect Priestley is also an excellent entertainer for example, with the introduction of Inspector Goole who has an eerie and almost unnatural energy creates suspense and awkwardness which makes the audience more intrigued of what is going to come next in the build up of the play. Priestly creates a dramatic atmosphere here by using the Inspector as a dramatic device. Not only is An Inspector Calls partly a detective story with the Inspector trying to reveal the unsolved issue of how Eva Smith died, he inspected us alright. Here Sheila clearly states that although Inspector Goole already knew what the Birling familys response would be to his question he still carries out enquiries of the murder although he was more interested in finding out about their morals than the suicide. The play can be classed as a detective story with such a predictable story line; the Inspector generally has some pleasing eccentricities or striking characteristics. Also many detectives stories end with unresolved problems. The Inspector creates a tense mood through his authoritative investigative skills through to the silent exit whilst the Birlings are left astonished, He walks straight out, leaving them staring, subdued and wondering. SHEILA is still quietly crying. MRS BIRLING has collapsed into a chair. as an effect of the Inspector as a dramatic device of Priestleys creation to leave the reader captivated within the play and eager to uncover the truth. On the other hand An Inspector Calls can also be categorised as a morality story due to the depiction of the seven deadly sins fused into each character. .u9d058494b57ef0555034a8c1a4b68f1c , .u9d058494b57ef0555034a8c1a4b68f1c .postImageUrl , .u9d058494b57ef0555034a8c1a4b68f1c .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u9d058494b57ef0555034a8c1a4b68f1c , .u9d058494b57ef0555034a8c1a4b68f1c:hover , .u9d058494b57ef0555034a8c1a4b68f1c:visited , .u9d058494b57ef0555034a8c1a4b68f1c:active { border:0!important; } .u9d058494b57ef0555034a8c1a4b68f1c .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u9d058494b57ef0555034a8c1a4b68f1c { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u9d058494b57ef0555034a8c1a4b68f1c:active , .u9d058494b57ef0555034a8c1a4b68f1c:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u9d058494b57ef0555034a8c1a4b68f1c .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u9d058494b57ef0555034a8c1a4b68f1c .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u9d058494b57ef0555034a8c1a4b68f1c .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u9d058494b57ef0555034a8c1a4b68f1c .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u9d058494b57ef0555034a8c1a4b68f1c:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u9d058494b57ef0555034a8c1a4b68f1c .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u9d058494b57ef0555034a8c1a4b68f1c .u9d058494b57ef0555034a8c1a4b68f1c-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u9d058494b57ef0555034a8c1a4b68f1c:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Journey's End EssayMost morality plays have a leading character who represents either humanity as a whole (Inspector Goole/voice of Priestley) or an entire class (upper class the Birlings, working class-Eva Smith). What also adds to the impact of Priestleys play is the fact that it was written before both world wars and before the Titanic sank which creates irony when Mr Birling comments, The Germans dont want war. Nobody wants war. From this we can tell that Mr Birling talks far too much, he is also very foolish and ignorant. The audience at that time would be very irritated at Mr Birlings comments as they have been through tormenting ordeals. As it is ironic Priestley can relate to the reader making the story more intriguing. The play opens with the Birling family enjoying their celebration it is thought that they are quite pleasant, however as Mr Birling is caught up in the moment he blurts out his true motives for the marriage of Gerald and his daughter, when Crofts and Birlings are no longer competing but are working together-for lower costs and higher prices implying that the engagement was all a business deal. It also shows that Mr Birling is greedy and selfish wanting more profit for lower wages. After a toast and some drinks, as if the Birling family have sensed Inspector Gooles presence their mood changes dramatically. Inspector Gooles character is very blunt and also has a sense of massiveness which creates authority and influence in the response of the Birlings and forces them to confess their mistake from which we can identify their flaws, Why should you do any protesting? It was you who turned the girl out in the first place, the Inspector here is telling Mr Birling off with powerful sentences clearly shows his dislike for their behaviour. He only uses this power over Mr Birling and Mrs Birling, whereas he treats Sheila, Gerald and Eric in a more pleasant manner however he still not lenient to any character, each of you helped to kill her. Inspector Goole confronts the Birlings trying to make them realise how much havoc they have caused and it is not enough to apologise or offer money although it shows what a capitalist Birling is when he states, Look, Inspector-Id give thousands yes, thousands. The only possible apology that comes anywhere near to reasonable is if the Birlings repent and change their ways and obviously from the above quote Mr Birling is showing no signs of this what so ever as he assumes everything can be bought with money which simply is not true. In addition although some of the Inspectors comments are out of order as an official as he says, I think you did something terribly wrong and youre going to spend the rest of your life regretting it, this is not appropriate because the Inspector has no hard evidence that the Birlings are to blame and also hypothetically he is to be non biased and also maintain a calm tone. But as the reader knows there is a mystery waiting to be solved and that the Birlings are being very stubborn about how much information they reveal, so the Inspectors actions could be thought to be acceptable. However if we relate to modern society police officer, even if they are sure that they know the suspect has committed the offence under no circumstances can they suggest their views as this is not professional. Not only that but because the Inspector beforehand knows the Birlings history from which they can not hide. So this gives an eerie touch to the inspectors personality and leaves the readers trying to figure out who the inspector maybe in disguise. The eerie effect links to the Inspectors name Goole which is a pun on ghoul suggesting that he may be a ghost in human form which is a dramatic device used to make the reader suspicious and want to know the truth.

In cold Blood Essay Example

In cold Blood Essay Example In cold Blood Paper In cold Blood Paper Essay Topic: In Cold Blood Although the novel, In Cold Blood, by Truman Capote, shocked the nation in its description of a heinous murder of an entire family, the initial crime theory Included a murder-seclude since the husband and wife slept In separate bedrooms. However, through careful, descriptive analysis of the crime scene, the actual culprits of the cold, blooded killing were found and determined to have serious mental illness of schizophrenia and other brain injuries leading to a series of events that ended in a brutal crime. The state of Kansas lacked money to examine Dick and Perry, but Doctor W. Mitchell Johns volunteered his services, as a specialist in criminal psychology and determining criminally sane and Insane. However, Perry felt they know they Just want to be entertained and hear the killers own terrible lips (268). Dry. Mitchell worked with twenty-five murder cases and he ran a series of test on Perry and Dick. He found that Dick was not mentally ill, but Perry on the other hand, had mild type of Schizophrenia. Finally, the Judge said, we will find out if they are insane, imbeciles or idiots, unable to comprehend their positions and aid in their defense (266). Once Dick and Perry were In court, Perry decided to give a part of his life story saying l was very severely beaten by the cottage mistress, who had called me names and made fun of me in front of all the boys for wetting the bed at night (275). In 1948, Perry joined the Army got in fights and pushed a Japanese police officer off of a bridge into the watt « (276). It seems Perry become upset whenever he remembers events of the past because of his alcoholic mother and a father that never spent time him. Whenever his father was stationed in Alaska, he made sure Perry went to school and never missed a day. Yet, the only person he loved and cared about was his brother, but he committed seclude shooting himself with the same type of rifle used to kill the Clutter family. Seems, when the killings occurred, Perry was destroying a key figure in some post traumatic configuration (302). As Perry told the Judge they never hurt me, like people have all my life. Maybe its just that the Clutters were the ones that had to for pay it (290). Am I sorry? If thats what you mean I am not. I dont feel anything about it (291). Its easy to kill, a lot easier than passing bad checks, said Perry (291). The Clutter family would of suffered severe traumas to brain and vital cranial structures inflicted by a shotgun, if they were still alive According to Dry. Mitchell, during the trial, the Clutters family lawyer showed pictures of the brutal death of the family members (298). Yet, Mr Fleming the lawyer said The sole reason the pictures are being introduced is to prejudice and inflame the minds of the Jurors ( 281 ). However, Smith related that he did not yet mention, the reason he broke into the house was to rape Nancy and the other was to kill the entire family (288). Mr Hickory talked in rout by saying my son suffered head Injuries In a car accident In July 1950, and since then he has never been the same (292). Yet, the judge orders a doctor specializing in physician, whom he found Dry. Jones that worked criminally insane. Within the usual definitions of sane and insane, Mr Hickory did know from wrong (294). Upon, Hickory had an average in intelligence, grasps new ideas easily and he is alert to whats happening around him, and shows no sign of mental confusion or damage, or concrete concept formation, yet, Hickory does show signs of emotional abnormality (294). Since his uncomfortable in his relationships to other people, and has a pathological inability to form and hold enduring personal attachments (295). Later, Perry talked in court saying was a likable kid, well liked around the neighborhood, he never done one thing out to acknowledge (296). Perry Smith shows definite signs of severe mental illness. His prison records, was marked by brutality and lack of concern on the part of both parents (296). Dry. Jones said, Perry has a paranoid orientation toward the world and distrustful of others and thinks that other people discriminate against and has a type of paranoid schizophrenic (294). At the time of the murder, Perry was at a stage of Schizophrenia, where he was not himself and was unable to control himself. Yet, the Judge found the crime it to be murder without apparent motive. Perry killed Mr Clutter, but he didnt want to leave any witnesses, so he killed the entire family. Attempting to Assess the criminal responsibility of murders, the law tries to divide them into two groups, the sane or insane, which sane is murderer is thought of sane acting upon rational motives that can be understood, though condemned, and the insane one as being driven by irrational senseless motives (298). Yet, the Judge was doing as many things possible to give the death penalty. Half of the men DRY. Johns studied had suffered severe physical violence or were rejected by the parents as children. Dry. Staten said the circumstances of the crime seem to fix exactly the concept of Murder without apparent motive, because three of the murders were logically motivate (301). The mother and her three children were because Smith killed Mr Clutter. Smith was under a mental eclipse, deep inside a schizophrenic darkness, for it was not entirely a flesh and blood man he suddenly discovered, but a key figure in some past aromatic configuration (302). Yet, Smith replied by saying l didnt want to harm the man, her was a very nice gentlemen. I thought so right to the moment I cut his throat, but the Clutters never hurt me like people have all my live. Maybe it Clutter were the ones who had to pay for it (302). Still, Judge Tate wanted to prosecute both of them, regardless who pulled the trigger Smith or Hickory them both were found guilty. Mr Fleming was Smiths and Hassocks lawyer he talked in trail and said Man is not an animal. He has a body and a soul that lives forever (303). Yet, Perry told the judge all we ask is for mercy; surely live imprisonment is small mercy (303). Yet, one of the Juror told Perry you have Just heard two energetic pleas of mercy in behalf of the defendants, but Mr Fleming and Mr Smith, were not at the Clutters house that fateful night very fortunate for them that they were not present to plead mercy for the doomed family (303). Still, Mr Green didnt take their plea and he threatened them the killers by saying our state provide death or by hanging for those who commit a murder in the first degree (304). Judge Tate turned and looked at the killers by saying they went armed with a hooting and a dagger, but they went to rob and kill (305). Their voices crumbled, when they heard these words coming out of the Judges mouth. One of the Jurors said what are we going to do with these men then bind a mans hands, feet, and cut his throat and blew out him brain (305). Yet, the Judge replied give them the minimum penalty and thats only one of four counts (305). The other counts were from guilty of Mrs Meier the prison cook over heard Dick crying like a baby and praying to god. They were both sent to the same Federal Prison at Fort Leavenworth, their cells were ext to each other. Yet, Dick became depressed and tried to end his life, by starving himself, and he didnt talk to anybody. Still, Perry Smith was taken out of the prison and sent to the hospital for nine weeks, and then he started to take law classes to appeal his charges; moreover, Dick wrote several letters to the Chairman of the Legal Aid Committee of the Kansas State Bar Association to ask for an appeal (326). Inexplicably, they rejected his as time passed, Richard Eugene Hickory and Perry Edward Smith, partners in crime, died on the gallows at the state prison on June 22, 965, for one of the bloodiest murders in Kansas criminal annals (337). In this novel, In Cold Blood, a heinous murder took place in the small town of Holcomb in Kansas. Were the entire family died in cold blood, due to the fact they had money. Yet, the town thought it was murder suicide because husband and wife slept in separate rooms. However, through the bloody foot print left behind, the killers found and determined to have serious mental illness of schizophrenia and other brain injuries leading to a series of events that ended in a brutal crime. It was a murder that shocked the nation and brought attention from several states.

How to Flavor Rock Candy

How to Flavor Rock Candy Ive been trying out kits for educational toys, like slime and the chemical volcano, but one kit I just cant bring myself to buy-and-try is the rock candy kit. Why? Its around $12 and doesnt even come with the sugar... just a stick, container, and flavored food coloring. I can come up with my own jar and popsicle stick to make my own rock candy and I suspect you can too. If you want flavoring, there are couple of ways to go. You can add a few drops of flavoring to your saturated sugar solution. These are extracts or flavorings that you would buy in the spice section of a grocery store. You use these by adding food coloring and a couple of drops of flavoring to your crystal solution. Cherry, lemon, lime, orange, mint, and cinnamon all work well. Another option is to dissolve Kool-aidâ„ ¢ or other drink mix in the crystal growing solution to (intensely) flavor your rock candy.If you have experience with the rock candy kit and think its worth the money, let me know and Ill try it out, but I suspect you can save your pennies and get equally good or better results on your own. Troubleshoot Problems Growing Rock Candy

Financial Modelling Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Financial Modelling - Research Paper Example , Total assets of company (expressed in  £ millions), Extent of team working within the company (expressed as a percentage), Scheme (coded as 1 if company has a profit sharing scheme) and 0 otherwise, Market share of company (expressed as a percentage), the age of the company (since how many years it was established) and lastly, Return on capital employed (also expressed as a percentage). First we show graphical representation of the data to understand any issues or patterns which arise from the data, we then conduct univariate and bivariate analysis to find out if there is a correlation between profit sharing scheme (the dependent variable) with the independent variables (the six aforementioned variables) one by one, later the multiple variable analysis to discover if the overall model is significant or not, which means we explore if the six independent variable all together have an influence on profit sharing scheme or not. Finally a logistic regression analysis was run to find o ut the impact (positive or negative) that the six independent variables have on the profit sharing scheme. The SPSS computer program was used to conduct the statistical analysis while the excel software was used for the graphical visualizations. Graphical visualization helps us to visually explore and understand the pattern of a given data set. In this section we present the graphical visualizations of the variables. We begin by the Profit margin of company (expressed in percentage). The graph clearly shows that that none of the companies has managed to reach a profit margin of 35% and slightly few have a profit margin of below 5%. The highest profit margin recorded is 32.33% and the lowest profit margin is 4.4%. Figure 2 presents a graph of total assets of company; we observe that most companies had assets of between  £ 2000-8000 (millions). The company with the highest assets had  £ 13,686.62(millions) worth of assets while the lowest company had  £ 270.65 (millions) worth of

Self Analysis Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Self Analysis - Essay Example The logic behind why people follow FGM is uncertain or it varies from community to community. Studies have categorized the practice according to its severity and modus operandi. However, it is the detachment of clitoris and lower lips of pudenda. After the cutting, the vagina might be infibulated leaving only a pinhole for urinating and menstruation. It has been reported that 95 million or more women in 25 countries have undergone this brutal practice. According to the report of BBC, besides African nations, the practice is prevalent in Middle East countries like Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Jordan and Syria. Even in the United States, 10,000 girls are believed to be at the risk from illegal operations within their own communities. The report also states that, young women in Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Sweden and UK also have undergone similar operations (BBC website). The immediate consequence of cutting varies such as severe pain, bleeding, and difficulty in passing urine, infections, death and shock. The long term impacts include chronic pain, infections, cysts and abscess, decreased sexual enjoyment, infertility, post traumatic stress, disorders and stress in child birth etc. (WHO website). Although present day legal discussion in many countries is concerned with the prohibition of FGM, the extermination efforts have been impeded due to the multi-faceted nature of the issue and other socio-religious boundaries. The castration has been considered as a highly valued ritual in the countries where the practice is endemic. Since FGM has been considered as an important religious cultural practice, many are forced to confuse it as an issue of cultural relativism. ‘Cultural relativism is the belief that all cultural practices and moral views can be seen as worthy, even when they are seen as unacceptable by many

Posthumus and Innogene Essay Example for Free

Posthumus and Innogene Essay The following passage is from Shakespeare’s ‘Cymbeline’ Act 4 Scene 2. In the quoted lines Innogen identifies Clotens to be Posthumus due to Posthumus’ garment worn by Clotens. Innogen looks at Clotens’ body and his garments and says â€Å"I know the shape of`s leg; this is his hand†. According to her, his foot is ‘Mercurial’ and thighs â€Å"Marcial’. From the first act the audience is accustomed to see a chaste Innogen who is attracted only to her husband, Postumus. However in this passage Innogene is made to speak admiring words about Clotens which is ironic to the audience. Her instant decision based on the garment is a kind of an amusement to the audience who is aware of the identity of the corpse. Innogene believes that she know Posthumus well enough to identify him without the head or the ‘jovial face’. The audience may expect better judgment from Innogene who till then did show good judgment in choosing Postumus to Clotens. This passage shows that Postumus and Clotens were more similar looking than Innogene would want to believe. These similarities are mentioned by Clotens in â€Å"I mean, the lines of my body are as well drawn as his;† in Act 4, Scene 1(9-10). She tries to see some logical reason for the gruesome murder of her husband. The first possibility that comes to her mind is Pisanio’s involvement. She suspects him to have revealed the details about Posthumous to Clotens. Everyone except Innogene knows that Pisanio has got nothing to do with this murder. Moreover Innogene is unable to think logically, for, if Pisanio was the culprit he may not have helped and sent her in pursuit of Posthumus. She concludes that Pisanio has joined with Clotens to kill Posthumus. In the passage Innogene call Clotens, â€Å"irregulous devil Clotens†. Clotens is interested in marrying Innogen. When he found out that this was not possible because she chose to be the wife of Posthumus, Clotens decided to murder Posthumus and rape her. He goes to the wilderness in search of Posthumous with pure hatred in his heart. Nevertheless he wears Posthumus’ garments while seeking out Posthumus and Innogene. This is ironic that he chose to wear the dress of his opponent in subduing him. He may have thought this would be a nice way to torture Innogene with the thoughts of her dead husband when he uses force on her. This may heighten the misery. This however goes a long way to show the cruel nature of Clotens. On the other hand the audience sees that Posthumus is aggrieved for ordering the death of his wife. He is repentant and tries to seek his own punishment by surrendering as a Roman soldier in to the hand of British troops. During the battle he takes the side of his motherland and protects it from the enemy attack, fulfilling the duty of the son of the soil. Deception in costume plays its part here again when he dresses as an Englishman and fights with Iachimo. Posthumus and Clotens are two opposite forces juxtaposed to bring out their contrasting natures to intensify the final good over evil concept. However Innogenes’ misunderstanding in identifying the corpse is the climax of this parallelism. This is an important scene in this play due to the death of Clotens and his misidentification as Postumous. Clotens has been the shadow of Posthumus throughout the play. At every mention of Posthumus there is a direct comparison drawn with Clotens as both are interested in noble Innogene. Death of Clotens signifies the death of evil and victory of good. However at this stage not all threads in the play are brought to a conclusive end. Moreover the difference between both is so strong that it needs to have a lingering effect for some time until alls well. Hence this scene is a good device to conclude the play in a progressive gradation.

The Statute of the Man in the Modern Catholic Anthropology Essay

The Statute of the Man in the Modern Catholic Anthropology ABSTRACT: In what follows, I examine the renaissance of the idea of freedom as a fundamental measure of humanity in the work of Karol Voitila (Pope John Paul II). I examine as well Karol Voitila's concept of the human person as found in his work "Love and Responsibility" as well as the encyclical Evangelium vitae, which affirms the incomparable value of the human person. I also consider the celestial predestination of the human person as discussed in the documents of the Second Vatican Council. The prevailing motive in the philosophy of the Renaissance and the following centuries is the affirmation of human liberty and dignity on the base of his life on the Earth, the emphasis on the innate human striving for food, happiness and liberty, for universal perfection and entirety of the human nature, for organic unity between the spiritual and the physical. I can not disagree with Erih Fromm, who emphasizes that even in the late Middle Ages the Catholic doctrines, and the philosophy of the Renaissance later, express the tendency to acknowledging the role of the human will and human exertion - the Catholicism is in harmony with the spirit, that dominates in the social groups, which economic status brings them the feeling of strength and independence. The Renaissance idea of freedom as a fundamental measure of human nature "finishes" in philosophy like Sheller and Sartr with apotheosis of the act and the constant choice. Butt the freedom as an act is simultaneously a human ability of selfmaster, self-improvement, restraining the mean passions and motives. Freedom is also the ability to be loyal to ourselves and to our beliefs, to reach the real creation in which th... ...izons. (See Àà ­Ãƒ ²Ãƒ ³Ãƒ  Ãƒ ­ Êà  Ãƒ §Ãƒ  Ãƒ ­Ãƒ ®Ãƒ ¢Ãƒ  . Âà ²Ãƒ ®Ãƒ °Ãƒ ®Ãƒ © Âà  Ãƒ ²Ãƒ ¨Ãƒ ªÃƒ  Ãƒ ­Ãƒ ±Ãƒ ªÃƒ ®Ãƒ © à ±Ãƒ ®Ãƒ ¡Ãƒ ®Ãƒ °. ÃÅ'à ®Ãƒ ±Ãƒ ªÃƒ ¢Ãƒ  , 1973, à ±Ãƒ ²Ãƒ °. 241-242). If we try to make a summary of the proposed in the Pastoral Constitution conception of the man, caused by the challenges off the atheism, the greatest of which is the general absence of any desire of after life, we could say, that this conception, even with the elements of concretness and sociality is a conception of the authentic, "eternal" man. That means that our thoughts must be directed to the outer world, which excels the real history and continues to be the transcendental knowledge source, the storehouse of the moral and social models, which permanently keep their position. (See Op. Cit, p. 244). And their durability is conditioned by our connection with God, which is now made actual due to the "mediation" of Jesus Christ and the present "growth of man in Jesus Christ".....

Is Graffiti an Art or a Crime Essay

Through the years, people have expressed themselves in different ways and manners. Some have chosen photography, drawings or sculpture. Others came up with new ways like graffiti which is a new form of urban expression that made controversial reactions. I believe that some graffiti is an artistic performance because of its expressive nature, beautiful display, and creative ways. The rest of it reveals a criminal behavior since it uses others’ properties without permission or consideration, harms the urban landscape, and sends negative messages. The major differences between both perceptions are the aim of the taggers and location of the tags. On the one hand, taggers have produced beautiful and expressive pieces that people appreciated. During a class trip to 5 Pointz, an outdoor art exhibit space in Long Island City, New York, where graffiti is permitted and regulated. I stood for few minutes in front of a tag of ghostly skulls surrounded by flames (The Picture). The skulls had an expression on their skinless faces that made me feel like hearing the sound of those portrayed people as if they were screaming out in pain with the sound of evil laughter in the background. This mixture of its beauty and livelihood made me and my classmates enjoy the experience. In addition, after admiring the excellence of the tags, I thought that those taggers must be very talented and creative to come up with such beautiful artworks, especially on those large surfaces and hard-to-reach places, bearing in mind that they’re only using spray paint. It makes you wonder how they could make all those fading colors and shades, and transform bare walls into three dimensional objects. They certainly are very creative and highly skilled. Before leaving the site, I noticed that there was a transportation corporation that actually had graffiti artists tag its wall with trucks to make it more appealing to commuters, which affirms that people do like and appreciate this art as long as it belongs where it is permitted. On the other hand, I denounce the effect that graffiti has had and continues to have on our urban landscape. That’s where it gets associated with vandalism, because instead of tagging specified places, taggers choose train cars, bridges and public walls, which make the cities look messy and hasty, forcing the authorities to spend unnecessary money to paint them over. Furthermore, most of graffiti, especially those done discretely and with no permission display gang names, obscene language and silly drawings which make many people think of it as crime and violence. In McCann’s novel Let the Great World Spin, Ciaran was accompanying his brother and looked across the van window to a church, and said â€Å"It was daubed in graffiti—whites, yellows, reds, silvers. TAGS 173. GRACO 76. The stained- glass windows had been broken with small stones. Even the cross on top was tagged. † (McCann, 34). When he said that even the cross was tagged, I thought that they were making a statement that their pride and art are above religion, and thus above other people’s beliefs and feelings. Graffitists were invading every surface, including sacred and religious ones. It seemed that they find their pleasure in what annoys and bothers their community, just like the person who gets pleasure in consuming drugs that are poisoning his own body. They leave others clean up, deal with the trauma of property damage, and wonder why their property became a target, whether it was hate and racism act, or just a tool in somebody’s careless adventure. Whereas many people find it hard to categorize graffiti, I think that the taggers are the ones who make of it an art or a crime based on their purposes and the locations they use. For instance, when I come across a tag that catches my eye, even if it is visually pleasant, it bothers me a lot to see that the tagger made it with the intent of defying the authorities, damaging public or private property, or just challenging and cursing his rivals, instead of making it to express himself and display his high talent. It loses its artistic value and becomes a cheap tool for his malicious intentions. I also believe that it depends heavily on where they’re putting up their work. If a graffitist uses the walls of my building without my permission, I would not be happy, and I certainly would not consider that as an artistic act, but as a reckless behavior showing disrespect. It is just as if someone rode your bike, without your permission, to perform some stunts and then brought it back to you and expected you to appreciate that. That is insane. Inversely, if the tagger performs on a spot where it is regulated and permitted (like the 5 Pointz site), I would get to see his pieces from a positive perspective. In conclusion, graffiti is basically an artistic performance that contains talent and aesthetic vision. It also is very expressive and meaningful. But, some taggers use individuals’ and public properties without their permission displaying gang-like negative messages and vandalizing our urban scenery which makes many of it considered as a criminal act. What distinguishes between graffiti being art and graffiti as an act of vandalism is the intent of its producers and the spots they chose to display their pieces. As people continue to live, there will continue to be inventions of new methods of social expression.

The Alamo

The movie started out with Sam Houston attempting to talk individuals into miming to Texas, promising them 640 acres of their choosing, but there was no mention of receiving a League of Land. The movie did a good job on depicting the habits of the characters, showing their attitudes and drinking habits. It also showed how concerning Travis was about his uniform. There was no mention of Daniel Cloud being the one to ring the bell; instead it mentioned someone spotting the Mexican Army while they were Norte to the Alamo.Within 24 hours of Santa Ana arriving, he sent a courier under a hit flag to negotiate surrender which was not shown in the movie. It did however show Bowie ride out to negotiate, and Travis firing the cannon in anger. Shortly into the siege it did show Bowie becoming sick from consumption, eventually becoming bedridden because of it. There was only a brief reading from Trivia's ‘Victory or Death† letter with no mention of the P. S. At the end of the letter. The movie showed a small Mexican detachment fire at the Alamo to size up the forces within.When the decision to burn the village was sought UT, in the movie it showed Davys Crockett by himself setting the village ablaze. In the movie there was no mention of one of the 32 men that came to the aide of the Alamo being shot by friendly fire as they were approaching the mission. On the Mexican side of the battle, Santa Ana said he was waiting for Sam Houston to enter the Alamo to attack, with no mention that they were actually waiting for the larger cannon.During Trivia's speech to his men, he didn't specifically mention the fact that Fanning was not coming and when he was knishes with it he didn't do the sword in sand. In the book it was only said that the Mexican band played the song on the morning of the attack, however in the movie the played it every morning. During the Mexican assault on the Alamo, in the movie there was not 3 distinct attacks just one large one. Trivia's â€Å"T he Mexicans are upon us, give them hell† was not shown in the movie before he was killed.Davys Crockett was shown as the only survivor of the Alamo, and there was no mention of Emily Dickinson. During the Battle of San Action there were quite a few quite few things that were off in the movie from the historical facts of the battle, from the location of the bridge, who was set in first, and placement of the Calvary. There was also no mention of TX Rusk informing Sam Houston that they had Santa Ana, but it did show Santa Ana in the lesser uniform. Overall the film was very well done and showed most of the historical facts about the Alamo, and was suspenseful enough to keep anyone's attention.The actual historical facts should have been a little more researched and hon. more distinct fully, such as when Travis did the â€Å"Sword in the Sand† speech. In the movie where it showed Travis dispatching Caps Segueing, Travis told Segueing that he chose him due to his knowledge o f the area. After doing a little research I discovered that Caps. Segueing was voted to deliver the letter to Houston despite Travis wanting him to stay for his knowledge of Mexican Customs and for the fact that he spoke the language. Anytime a movie is made such as â€Å"The Alamo† utmost attention to detail should be taken for factorization.

Mineral Photos - How to Take Great Photos of Minerals

Mineral Photos - How to Take Great Photos of Minerals Do you want to take great pictures of your mineral specimens? Here are some tips and tricks to help your mineral photos turn out looking wonderful. Mineral Photography Tips Know your camera.You can take wonderful pictures of mineral specimens using a disposable camera or cell phone; you can take terrible photos using a high-end SLR. If you know what works in terms of distance and lighting for the camera you are using then youll have a much better chance of taking a great shot.Be accurate.If you are taking a photo of a mineral out in the field, then take the picture of the mineral where you found it rather than moving it to a pretty location.Take multiple pictures.If youre in the field, approach your specimen from different angles and take a variety of shots. Do the same back home. Taking ten shots of the exact same angle, background, and lighting is less likely to give you a great photo than taking several different photos.Make the mineral the center of attention.If possible, make it the only object in the photo. Other objects will detract from your specimen and may cast nasty shadows on your mineral.Choose your background wisely.I take the majority of my pictures on a white plastic cutting board because it doesnt cast reflections back toward the camera and because I can apply light behind the mineral. White is great for specimens with good contrast, but it doesnt work as well for light-colored minerals. Those minerals may do better with a gray background. Be careful using a very dark background because some cameras will take a picture that washes the detail out of your specimen. Experiment with different background to see what works best. Experiment with lighting.You are going to get different pictures in sunlight than you will under fluorescent or incandescent lights. The angle of the light makes a big difference. The intensity of the light matters. Look criticially at your photo to see if it has distracting shadows or whether it flattens out any three-dimensional structure of your mineral specimen. Also, keep in mind some minerals are fluorescent. What happens in you add black light to your specimen?Process your image, with care.Pretty much every device that takes pictures can process them. Crop your images and consider correcting them if the color balance is off. You might want to adject the brightness, contrast, or gamma, but try not to go beyond that. You might be able to process your image to make it prettier, but dont sacrifice beauty for accuracy.To Label or Not To Label?If you are going to include a label with your mineral, you can photograph a (neat, preferably printed) label along with your mineral. Otherwi se, you can overlay a label on your picture using photo editing software. If you are using a digital camera and arent labeling your specimen right away, its a good idea to give your photo a meaningful name (like cordundum rather than the default filename, which is probably the date). Indicate ScaleYou may wish to include a ruler or coin with your specimen to indicate scale. Otherwise, when you describe your image you might want to indicate the size of your mineral.Try the ScannerIf you dont have a camera, you may be able to get a good picture of a mineral specimen by scanning it with a digital scanner. In some cases a scanner can produce a nice image.Take NotesIts a good idea to jot down what works and what fails miserably. This is especially helpful if you are taking a large sequence of pictures and making a lot of changes.

Amistad Summary

Amistad Movie Summary The film begins in the depths of the schooner La Amistad, a slave-ship carrying captured West Africans into slavery. The films protagonist, Sengbe Pieh, most known by his Spanish name, Cinque, painstakingly picks a nail out of the ships structure and uses it to pick the lock on his shackles. Freeing a number of his companions, Cinque initiates a rebellion on board the storm-tossed vessel. In the ensuing fighting, several Africans and most of the ships Spanish crew are killed, but Cinque saves two of the ships officers, Ruiz and Montez, whom he believes can sail them back to Africa. After six weeks have passed, the ship is running out of food and fresh water, and Cinque is growing angry with Yamba who believes keeping the Spaniards alive is the only way to get back to Africa. During the night, they pass another vessel, carrying a group of wealthy English-speaking passengers having a dinner party on deck. The next day, they sight land. Unsure of their location, a group of African men takes one of the ships boats to shore to fetch fresh water. While there, La Amistad is found by a military vessel bearing an American flag the Spaniards have tricked the Africans by sailing directly for the United States. Captured by the American Navy, the Amistad Africans are taken to a municipal jail in New Haven, Connecticut, where the ships occupants, and a tearful Cinque, are thrown into a grim dungeon, awaiting trial. The films focus now shifts to Washington, D. C. , where a session in the House of Representatives introduces John Quincy Adams (Anthony Hopkins), the elderly former President and politician. While strolling in the gardens, Adams is introduced to two of the countrys leading abolitionists; the elderly freed slave Theodore Joadson (Morgan Freeman) and Christian activist Mr. Tappan (Stellan Skarsgard), both of whom are leading shipping magnates in New England and co-proprietors of the pro-abolitionist newssheet The Emancipator. The two have heard of the plight of the Amistad Africans and attempt to enlist Adams to help their cause. Adams, apparently verging on senility, refuses to help, claiming that he neither condemns nor condones slavery. News of the Amistad incident also reaches current President of the United States, Martin Van Buren (Nigel Hawthorne), who is bombarded with demands for compensation from the juvenile Spanish Head of State, Queen Isabella II of Spain (Anna Paquin). At a preliminary hearing in a district court, the Africans are charged with insurrection on the high seas, and the case rapidly dissolves into conflicting claims of property ownership from the Kingdom of Spain, the United States, the surviving officers of La Amistad, and the officers of the naval vessel responsible for re-capturing the slave-ship. Aware that they cannot fight the case on moral grounds, the two abolitionists enlist the help of a young attorney specializing in property law; Roger Sherman Baldwin (Matthew McConaughey). At the jail, Baldwin and the abolitionists, along with a nervous Professor of Linguistics, attempt to talk to the Amistad Africans, but neither side is able to understand anything the other party says. In the prison, events among the Africans are accelerating. Yamba, Cinques apparent rival for authority amongst the Africans, has converted to Christianity and is now resigned to his death, believing that execution will send them to a pleasant afterlife. The death of a young man provokes the Africans into a furious demonstration against the American authorities, screaming and chanting in their native languages as a prison riot threatens. As the hearings drag on, Baldwin and Joadson regularly walk round the city docks, counting numbers in the Mande language, in an attempt to recruit an interpreter. They eventually happen upon a black sailor in the Royal Navy, James Covey (Chiwetel Ejiofor). Using Coveys linguistic abilities, Baldwin and his companions are able to talk to Cinque. In his first speaking role in the courtroom, Cinque, through a series of flashbacks, tells the haunting story of how he became a slave. Cinque, a peasant farmer and young husband and father in West Africa, was kidnapped by African slave-hunters and taken to the slave fortress of Lomboko, an illegal facility in the British Protectorate of Sierra Leone. There, he and hundreds of other captured Africans were loaded onto transatlantic slave-ship (Tecora). Cinque tells of the various horrors of the Middle Passage, including frequent rape, horrific torture, and random executions carried out by the crew, including the deaths of fifty people deliberately drowned in order to save food. Upon their arrival in Cuba, Cinque was sold at a slave market and purchased, along with many other Tecora survivors, by the owners of La Amistad. Once aboard La Amistad, Cinque was able to free himself of his shackles, and began the slaves rebellion for freedom. The courtroom drama continues as District Attorney William S. Holabird (Pete Postlethwaite) and Secretary of State John Forsyth (David Paymer) press their case for property rights and dismiss Cinques story as a mere piece of fiction. While exploring the impounded vessel La Amistad for much-needed evidence to support the Africans claims, Baldwin happens upon a notebook, stuffed into a crevice by Ruiz and Montez to conceal the evidence of illegal slave-trading. Using the book as hard evidence of illegal trading, Baldwin calls expert witnesses including Captain Fitzgerald (Peter Firth), a British naval commander assigned to patrol the West Africa coastline to enforce the British Empires anti-slavery policies. As Fitzgerald is cross-examined by the haughty Holabird, tension in the courtroom rises, ultimately prompting Cinque to leap from his seat and cry Give us free over and over, a heartfelt plea using the English he has learned. Cinques plea touches many, apparently including the judge in a court ruling, Judge Coglin (Jeremy Northam) dismisses all claims of ownership, rules that the Africans were captured illegally and not born on plantations, orders the arrest of the Amistads remaining crew on charges of slave-trading, and authorizes the United States to convey the Amistad Africans back to Africa at the expense of the nation. While Cinque, Joadson, Baldwin, and the jubilant Africans celebrate their victory, a state dinner at the White House threatens to overturn the ruling. While conversing with the Spanish Ambassador to Washington, Senator John C. Calhoun (Arliss Howard) launches into a damning diatribe aimed at President Van Buren, emphasising the economic importance of slaves in the South, and ends his tirade with a concealed but clear threat that should the government set a precedent for abolition by releasing the Amistad Africans, the South will have little choice but to go to war with the north. With his advisors warning that the Amistad incident could bring the United States one big step closer to civil war, President Van Buren orders that the case be submitted to the Supreme Court, dominated by its Southern slave-owning judges. Furious, Mr. Tappan splits with Joadson and Baldwin, who break the news to an enraged and disgusted Cinque. In need of an ally with legal background in the intricacies of Supreme Court workings, Baldwin and Joadson meet again with John Quincy Adams, who has been following the case carefully. Adams, aware that Cinque is now refusing to talk to Baldwin, invites the African leader to his home. While Adams gives him a rambling tour of his greenhouse, Cinques emotional reaction to seeing a West African violet, native to his homeland, convinces Adams to assist the case. At the Supreme Court, John Quincy Adams gives a long and passionate speech in defense of the Africans. Arguing that if Cinque were white and had rebelled against the British, the United States would have exalted him as a hero; and that the Africans rebellion to gain their freedom was no different to the Americans rebellion against their oppressors some seventy years earlier. Arguing that condemning the Amistad Africans would render the principles and ideals of the Constitution worthless, he exhorts the judges to free the Africans, stating that the looming threat of civil war will simply be the final battle of the American Revolution. His case made, the United States awaits the Supreme Courts ruling. On the day of judgment, Justice Joseph Story (Harry Blackmun) announces the Supreme Courts decision on the case. Believing that the Amistad Africans were illegally kidnapped from their homes in Africa, United States laws on slave ownership do not apply. Furthermore, since that was the case, the Amistad Africans were within their rights to use force to escape their confinement. The Supreme Court authorizes the release of the Africans and their conveyance back to Africa. Legally freed for the second and final time, Cinque bids emotional farewells to his companions; shaking Adams hand, giving Joadson his most treasured possession, a lion tooth which is his only memento of Africa, and thanking Baldwin in English. As Cinque is about to leave, Baldwin clasps Cinque and bids a farewell, in the Mande language, to the African leader. The end of the film depicts various scenes. Royal marines assault the Lomboko Slave Fortress, killing the slavers and freeing the kidnapped Africans held within the dungeons. With the fortress evacuated, Captain Fitzgerald, who has finally located the fortress, orders his warship of the Royal Navys West Africa Anti-Slavery Squadron to open fire on the facility, destroying Lomboko. Interspersed with this are scenes of Martin Van Buren losing his election campaign. The final scenes depict Cinque and the freed Africans returning to Africa, dressed in white, the West African colour of victory and accompanied by James Covey, who has shed his British uniform in exchange for African attire.

Civil Aerospace Market Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Civil Aerospace Market - Case Study Example In the following discussion we'll analyze the industry structure of the civil aerospace market in general and the two main companies in particular. vi. World's second-largest defense company. Boeing Integrated Defense Systems provides end-to-end services for large-scale systems that combine sophisticated communication networks with air-, land-, sea- and space-based platforms for global military, government and commercial customers i. FAA (US) Aerospace forecast for the period 2006-2017 states that, 'By 2017, U.S. commercial air carriers are projected to fly 1.6 trillion ASMs and transport 1.07 billion enplaned passengers a total of 1.256 trillion passenger miles. Passenger trip length is also forecast to increase by more than 120 miles over the forecast to 1,171.9 miles (up 10.2 miles annually). iv. New entrants in the business particularly from India, China and Japan. These countries are trying very hard to tap the market with state owned companies getting full support from respective governments Headquartered in France and employing about 60,000 people worldwide Airbus has made a commitment to itself that it will remain in the 40-60 percent range as far as market share is concerned1. During 2006 also Airbus was able to capture 44 percent market share with 824 new firm orders worth US$75.1 billion. Buyers'/Consu... v. Highly investment intensive and labor intensive business. Opportunities i. FAA (US) Aerospace forecast for the period 2006-2017 states that, 'By 2017, U.S. commercial air carriers are projected to fly 1.6 trillion ASMs and transport 1.07 billion enplaned passengers a total of 1.256 trillion passenger miles. Passenger trip length is also forecast to increase by more than 120 miles over the forecast to 1,171.9 miles (up 10.2 miles annually). ii. New technological breakthroughs in IT, computers and electronics industries, providing opportunity to serve the customer in a better way. iii. New product development efforts are focused on the Boeing 787 Dreamliner, a super-efficient airplane that is expected to be in service in 2008. Threats i. Global slowdown (decelerating growth) in airlines business, particularly after the 9/11 incident ii. Shrinking profit margins for airlines industry, resulting in closing down of many airlines iii. Fluctuating oil prices and turbulent political scene in the middle-east region iv. New entrants in the business particularly from India, China and Japan. These countries are trying very hard to tap the market with state owned companies getting full support from respective governments v. Widespread opposition of the outsourcing moves by the unions at Boeing as well as from other unions in the country, fearing widespread retrenchments. SWOT analysis for Airbus Headquartered in France and employing about 60,000 people worldwide Airbus has made a commitment to itself that it will remain in the 40-60 percent range as far as market share is concerned1. During 2006 also Airbus was able to capture 44 percent market share with 824 new firm orders worth US$75.1 billion. Strengths: Leading position in the